Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
Anesth Analg ; 2023 Dec 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091478

RESUMEN

Physician unionization is gaining traction in the United States, with <10% of practicing physicians now members, up from historically weak support. Factors that drive interest in unions include a decreased number of independent practitioners, an increase in workloads, and the erosion of autonomy. Approximately 56% of anesthesiologists are considered employees and may be eligible for union membership. Physician unions may provide higher wages, better working conditions, and legal protection. However, they also raise concerns about patient care and professionalism. This article discusses the legal and regulatory framework governing the unionization of physicians, benefits, challenges, and potential future developments. Continued analysis and debate are necessary to determine the optimal role of physician unions in the health care industry.

2.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 48(8): 387-391, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36754543

RESUMEN

Workplace violence is any physical assault, threatening behavior or other verbal abuse directed toward persons at work or in the workplace. The incidence of workplace violence in healthcare settings in general and more specifically the pain clinic is thought to be underestimated due to hesitancy to report, lack of support from management and healthcare systems, and lack of institutional policies as it relates to violence from patients against healthcare workers. In the following article, we explore risk factors that place clinicians at risk of workplace violence, the cost and impact of workplace violence, how to build a violence prevention program and lastly how to recover from violence in the practice setting.


Asunto(s)
Clínicas de Dolor , Violencia Laboral , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Violencia Laboral/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , Agresión , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Anesth Analg ; 135(4): 697-703, 2022 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36108183

RESUMEN

ADDENDUM: Please note that in the interim since this paper was accepted for publication, new governmental regulations, pertinent to the topic, have been approved for implementation. The reader is thus directed to this online addendum for additional relevant information: http://links.lww.com/AA/E44.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestesiología , Humanos
9.
Pediatr Transplant ; 23(3): e13359, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30734422

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study's objective was to investigate compassionate ventricular assist device deactivation (VADdeact) in children from the perspective of the pediatric heart failure provider. BACKGROUND: Pediatric VAD use is a standard therapy for advanced heart failure. Serious adverse events may affect relative benefit of continued support, leading to consideration of VADdeact. Perspectives and practices regarding VADdeact have been studied in adults but not in children. METHODS: A web-based anonymous survey of clinicians for pediatric VAD patients (<18 years) was sent to list-serves for the ISHLT Pediatric Council, the International Consortium of Circulatory Assist Clinicians Pediatric Taskforce, and the Pediatric Cardiac Intensivist Society. RESULTS: A total of 106 respondents met inclusion criteria of caring for pediatric VAD patients. Annual VAD volume per clinician ranged from <4 (33%) to >9 (20%). Seventy percent of respondents had performed VADdeact of a child. Response varied to VADdeact requests by parent or patient and was influenced by professional degree and region of practice. Except for the scenario of intractable suffering, no consensus on VADdeact appropriateness was reported. Age of child thought capable of making informed requests for VADdeact varied by subspecialty. The majority of respondents (62%) do not feel fully informed of relevant legal issues; 84% reported that professional society supported guidelines for VADdeact in children had utility. CONCLUSION: There is limited consensus regarding indications for VADdeact in children reported by pediatric VAD provider survey respondents. Knowledge gaps related to legal issues are evident; therefore, professional guidelines and educational resources related to pediatric VADdeact are needed.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Pediatría/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Privación de Tratamiento/ética , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Canadá , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Toma de Decisiones , Trasplante de Corazón , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado de Menores , Cooperación Internacional , Internet , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Médicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
12.
JAMA Pediatr ; 172(2): 188-192, 2018 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29228163

RESUMEN

The US Food and Drug Administration's December 2016 approval of nusinersen for the treatment of patients with all subtypes of spinal muscular atrophy ushered in a new era for patients with spinal muscular atrophy, their families, and all those involved in their care. The extreme cost of the medication and the complicated logistical requirements for administering nusinersen via lumbar puncture have created practical challenges that raise important ethical considerations. We discuss 6 challenges faced at the institutional level in the United States: cost, limited evidence, informed consent, treatment allocation, fair distribution of responsibilities, and transparency with stakeholders. These challenges must be understood to ensure that patients with spinal muscular atrophy benefit from treatment, are protected from harm, and are treated fairly.


Asunto(s)
Ética Médica , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligonucleótidos/economía , Oligonucleótidos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
14.
Pediatrics ; 139(6)2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28562274

RESUMEN

One of the most complicated ethical issues that arises in children's hospitals today is the issue of whether it is ever permissible to perform a procedure for a minor that will result in permanent sterilization. In most cases, the answer is no. The availability of good, safe, long-acting contraception allows surgical options to be postponed when the primary goal of such surgical options is to prevent pregnancy. But what if a minor has congenital urogenital anomalies or other medical conditions for which the best treatment is a hysterectomy? In those cases, the primary goal of therapy is not to prevent pregnancy. Instead, sterility is an unfortunate side effect of a medically indicated treatment. Should that side effect preclude the provision of a therapy that is otherwise medically appropriate? We present a case that raises these issues, and asked experts in law, bioethics, community advocacy, and gynecology to respond. They discuss whether the best option is to proceed with the surgery or to cautiously delay making a decision to give the teenager more time to carefully consider all of the options.


Asunto(s)
Histerectomía/ética , Consentimiento Informado de Menores , Esterilización Reproductiva/ética , Anomalías Urogenitales/cirugía , Útero/anomalías , Vagina/anomalías , Adolescente , Femenino , Fertilidad , Humanos , Histerectomía/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embarazo , Esterilización Reproductiva/legislación & jurisprudencia , Útero/cirugía , Vagina/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...